Sometimes, I really hate it when I'm right. Six months ago, when Donald Trump was inaugurated, I predicted that he would get us in a nuclear confrontation within six months. It took slightly longer, but it gives me no pleasure to report that this confrontation appears to be imminent.
On Tuesday, The Washington Post reported that North Korea has now developed a nuclear device small enough to be placed in a missile. Combine this alarming news with recent reports that North Korea has now developed a missile capable of striking the mainland of the United Sates, and everyone should be very, very nervous. True to form, Trump reacted like the school-yard bully he is and threatened to rain "fire and fury" down on North Korea. For its part, North Korea has threatened to strike Guam with a missile. A couple thoughts:
This is a time when we need a thoughtful, measured response. Instead, we're stuck with a school-yard bully, a man-child with access to this nation's nuclear codes and no idea what he's doing. This is no time for the "cowboy diplomacy" made famous by George "Dubya" Bush. This is a time when we need to be leaning on our allies. The question is, how many allies do we really have left?
One of the worst things Trump has done since taking power is to alienate many of our traditional allies. He's insulted them. He's failed to affirm that we stand with them (this one is specific to NATO). He's shown himself to be utterly ignorant of world affairs and our role in them. He has withdrawn us from some key treaties and wants to renegotiate some key trade agreements. He has, in effect, moved to isolate us from the rest of the world. So how can we now expect those allies to come to our defense when Trump has basically provoked this confrontation with North Korea with his thoughtless schoolyard taunts?
Remember the fist Gulf War? That war was successful largely because we had the world on our side when confronting Saddam Hussein. After 9/11, we had the goodwill and support of the entire world. And while the younger Bush was reckless with his talk of being "with us or against us," even he knew how far he could push things. Even he managed to build a coalition, even if it wasn't as solid or as big as the one built by his father.
Unfortunately, Trump knows no such boundaries. He honestly believes that we can win this battle through our military might alone. In his mind, we don't need the rest of the world. That is a very dangerous mindset. While it is true that we are the world's sole remaining superpower, it's also true that we can't win this battle alone. Our confrontation with North Korea will ultimately affect the rest of the world. And we need the world's help if we are to have any hope of containing this growing threat. We can only hope that Trump's ignorance and ham-handed foreign policy haven't made that impossible.
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
Sunday, August 6, 2017
GOP has lost moral high ground on Trump
Recently, it's become apparent that many Republicans are beginning to have "buyer's remorse" when it comes to Donald Trump. They are beginning to realize too late that Trump is racist and incompetent, and that he really doesn't know what he's doing. Many now are beginning to seek safe political cover. To those people, I say, tough. You made your bed. Now, you have to lie in it and accept the consequaences of your inaction.
Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona is the latest in a growing number of Republicans who are beginning to speak out against Trump. Recently, Flake penned an op-ed piece in Politico, in which he argued that the GOP is in denial about Trump. Add to that some recent actions in the Senate, including passing tough new sanctions against Russia (opposed by Trump), acting to make sure Trump doesn't fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the failure of Senate Republicans to repeal Obamacare, and it's clear that Republicans are starting to realize what a grave mistake they made in nominating Trump last summer. Good. Better late than never, I suppose. But the question remains: Where were these people six months ago? Where were they on Jan. 20, when we swore in the most incompetent president in American history?
It's encouraging to see that Republicans are finally coming to their senses. Maybe they will finally give up their love affair with the extreme right and move back toward the political middle, where the majority of Americans reside. But let's be clear. Republicans have no right to claim any kind of moral high ground in all this. After all, you can't embrace a loudmouth, xenophobic racist like Trump and claim any kind of moral high ground. You can't knowingly embrace his blazing incompetence -- something that was blindingly obvious to anyone who was paying attention during the campaign -- then claim that you were duped or otherwise misled. Republicans knew exactly what they were getting in Trump. They simply didn't care. They were so determined to beat Hillary Clinton, so blinded by their hatred of her and her husband, that they were willing to make a deal with the devil (in a manner of speaking). And now, they are reaping what they have sown, and they're trying to protect themselves.
Voters shouldn't let them get away with it. In 2018, they should sweep the Republicans out of power and return Congress to Democrratic control. Then, we should get serious about impeaching Trump for colluding with Russia and general incompetence and put our government back in the hands of competent adults. It's not too late to right the ship of state. We have a chance to put an end to this nightmare. The question is, do we have the will?
Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona is the latest in a growing number of Republicans who are beginning to speak out against Trump. Recently, Flake penned an op-ed piece in Politico, in which he argued that the GOP is in denial about Trump. Add to that some recent actions in the Senate, including passing tough new sanctions against Russia (opposed by Trump), acting to make sure Trump doesn't fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the failure of Senate Republicans to repeal Obamacare, and it's clear that Republicans are starting to realize what a grave mistake they made in nominating Trump last summer. Good. Better late than never, I suppose. But the question remains: Where were these people six months ago? Where were they on Jan. 20, when we swore in the most incompetent president in American history?
It's encouraging to see that Republicans are finally coming to their senses. Maybe they will finally give up their love affair with the extreme right and move back toward the political middle, where the majority of Americans reside. But let's be clear. Republicans have no right to claim any kind of moral high ground in all this. After all, you can't embrace a loudmouth, xenophobic racist like Trump and claim any kind of moral high ground. You can't knowingly embrace his blazing incompetence -- something that was blindingly obvious to anyone who was paying attention during the campaign -- then claim that you were duped or otherwise misled. Republicans knew exactly what they were getting in Trump. They simply didn't care. They were so determined to beat Hillary Clinton, so blinded by their hatred of her and her husband, that they were willing to make a deal with the devil (in a manner of speaking). And now, they are reaping what they have sown, and they're trying to protect themselves.
Voters shouldn't let them get away with it. In 2018, they should sweep the Republicans out of power and return Congress to Democrratic control. Then, we should get serious about impeaching Trump for colluding with Russia and general incompetence and put our government back in the hands of competent adults. It's not too late to right the ship of state. We have a chance to put an end to this nightmare. The question is, do we have the will?
Sunday, July 30, 2017
Trump's lack of accomplishments actually a good thing
Donald Trump has now been in the White House for a little more than six months, so it seems like a good time to look back and ask, what has he accomplished so far? If we're honest (and despite what his most ardent supporters claim), the answer is not very much.
Trump claimed recently that he's signed more bills so far than any president in history. That's simply not true. Sure, he's signed a gaggle of executive orders repealing a bunch of Obama era regulations and restarting the XL pipeline, among other things. But let's take a look at the major promises he made on the campaign trail:
Health care: This is perhaps his biggest failing. Trump promised Americans that he would repeal President Obama's signature legislative achievement on his very first day in office. So far, that hasn't happened. In fact, not only have Republicans been unable to repeal Obamacare, it's become very clear that they have no real plan to replace it with, and that they never had a plan. It's become clear that they only used the issue to win votes and gain power. The problem is, once they achieved that goal, they had no idea what to do next. In the meantime, thank goodness, Obamacare survives.
The Wall: So far, this has failed to materialize. And despite the fact that the number of deportations has increased and DREAMers are now being deported, it's not even on the radar. There's been no discussion about funding. And there certainly has been no more discussion about Mexco paying for the wall. For right now, at least, it's a dead issue.
Muslim ban: This has met with only limited success. His first attempt was roundly rejected when it failed to take into account people who were here legally. He tried again, and this time, met with a very narrow definition of success. The ban was allowed to go into effect, but it is far from what he wanted, since it allows almost all manner of relatives to come into the country instead of the very narrow definition that he tried to implement originally. The overall impact is that very few people are actually kept out, and that's a good thing. And the existing ban still faces legal challenges.
Jobs: This was perhaps the one thing that put him over the top. And yet, it also has been proven to be all smoke and mirrors. Right before the election, it was announced that Trump had cut a deal with Carrier to keep jobs in Indianapolis. This was touted as evidence of Trump "going to bat" for the working class. Now, we know that very few jobs, if any, were actually saved. In fact, Carrier just announced that 600 people would soon be laid off in two waves. So how many jobs did he actually save? Consider also his answer for putting Americans back to work. Trump wants to put steep punitive tariffs on goods coming into this country. The idea is two-fold: keep foreign-made goods from flooding the market and encourage people to buy American. Sounds good, right? Except that our trading partners have already said that they would respond by placing steep punitive tariffs on American goods coming into their countries. Which would, of course, wreak havoc on our economy. Keep in mind also that China, who buys more American-made goods than anyone in the world, holds trillions of dollars in U.S. debt, and the folly of this move becomes apparent. If China is angered and decides to call in those markers, the U.S. economy would crater and would likely never recover. So how is this a good idea again?
The truth is, Trump has accomplished very little in his first six months. And while that would normally be cause for concern, in this case, I say good. I hope it continues. Because the less he accomplishes, the safer we, and the world, are.
Trump claimed recently that he's signed more bills so far than any president in history. That's simply not true. Sure, he's signed a gaggle of executive orders repealing a bunch of Obama era regulations and restarting the XL pipeline, among other things. But let's take a look at the major promises he made on the campaign trail:
Health care: This is perhaps his biggest failing. Trump promised Americans that he would repeal President Obama's signature legislative achievement on his very first day in office. So far, that hasn't happened. In fact, not only have Republicans been unable to repeal Obamacare, it's become very clear that they have no real plan to replace it with, and that they never had a plan. It's become clear that they only used the issue to win votes and gain power. The problem is, once they achieved that goal, they had no idea what to do next. In the meantime, thank goodness, Obamacare survives.
The Wall: So far, this has failed to materialize. And despite the fact that the number of deportations has increased and DREAMers are now being deported, it's not even on the radar. There's been no discussion about funding. And there certainly has been no more discussion about Mexco paying for the wall. For right now, at least, it's a dead issue.
Muslim ban: This has met with only limited success. His first attempt was roundly rejected when it failed to take into account people who were here legally. He tried again, and this time, met with a very narrow definition of success. The ban was allowed to go into effect, but it is far from what he wanted, since it allows almost all manner of relatives to come into the country instead of the very narrow definition that he tried to implement originally. The overall impact is that very few people are actually kept out, and that's a good thing. And the existing ban still faces legal challenges.
Jobs: This was perhaps the one thing that put him over the top. And yet, it also has been proven to be all smoke and mirrors. Right before the election, it was announced that Trump had cut a deal with Carrier to keep jobs in Indianapolis. This was touted as evidence of Trump "going to bat" for the working class. Now, we know that very few jobs, if any, were actually saved. In fact, Carrier just announced that 600 people would soon be laid off in two waves. So how many jobs did he actually save? Consider also his answer for putting Americans back to work. Trump wants to put steep punitive tariffs on goods coming into this country. The idea is two-fold: keep foreign-made goods from flooding the market and encourage people to buy American. Sounds good, right? Except that our trading partners have already said that they would respond by placing steep punitive tariffs on American goods coming into their countries. Which would, of course, wreak havoc on our economy. Keep in mind also that China, who buys more American-made goods than anyone in the world, holds trillions of dollars in U.S. debt, and the folly of this move becomes apparent. If China is angered and decides to call in those markers, the U.S. economy would crater and would likely never recover. So how is this a good idea again?
The truth is, Trump has accomplished very little in his first six months. And while that would normally be cause for concern, in this case, I say good. I hope it continues. Because the less he accomplishes, the safer we, and the world, are.
Sunday, July 16, 2017
Trump supporters deserve our scorn, not sympathy
One almost has to feel sorry for Trunp supporters, and the GOP in general. Every day, it seems a new scanadal surfaces that they have to defend, or there's fresh new evidence of Trump's breathtaking incompetence. The latest evidence of this is seen in recent reports that Trump's son, Don Jr., took a meeting with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin because he thought she had information damaging to Hillary Clinton. This is just the latest in a growing mountain of evidence that Trump and his campaign did, in fact, collude with the Russians in trying to throw the election to Trump. Of course, even when faced with incontrovertible proof of collusion, the GOP continues to deny that there's anything amiss. "There's nothing to see here," they continue to say. "This is all just made up poppycock in an attempt to damage the greatest president since Reagan. This is FAKE NEWS."
In the first place, let's be clear. There's no such thing as "fake news," at least not in the sense that Trump is using it, Just because you don't like a story doesn't make it fake. Just because you don't agree with something you read doesn't make it fake, Facts are facts, And denying their existence just because you don't like them doesn't make them any less true. Now, granted. It must be hard to be a Trump supporter. Just the sheer number of scandals and missteps that need defending must be exhausting. It's almost enough to make you feel sorry for them, until you begin to take a closer look at Trump's (and the GOP's) agenda.
Take the GOP's doomed effort to repeal and replace Obamacare. This may be the single meanest piece of legislation I"ve ever seen. Among other things, it would undo the gains of the last eight years in the number of people with access to health care. More than 20 million people would be knocked off the rolls, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. It would once again allow insurance companies to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. And perhaps, worst of all, it would allow insurance providers to charge older Americans (read, those who can least afford it) up to five times more than younger Americans. This shouldn't be called "repeal and replace." It should be
called what it is: "Repeal and restore" (as in restore the old, broken system we had before). Or better yet, "the Ebenezer Scrooge Act of 2017" (You know, as in, 'If there be poor people, then let them be about the business of dying and reduce the excess population.'"
Or take the administration's controversial Muslim ban. Trump and his supporters are playing this off as a way to ensure national security. That's disingenuous, at best. Consider that one of the biggest sponsors of international terrorism -- Saudi Arabia -- isn't on the list. Or that Trump himself has called this a Muslim ban. Let's call this what this is: This is racist fear-mongering at its worst. And the worst part is, it does nothing to make us any safer. For those who defend it, it calls into question whether you are, in fact, racist, or whether you are just willfully ignorant.
I think CNN commentator Van Jones hit the nail on the head Electikon Night when he observed that Trump's victory was a case of "whitelash," that it's a reaction against eight years of Obama -- the nation's first black president. This nation is changing, It's becoming more diverse. And there's a segment of the population that feels threatened by that. Trump's victory (if you can call it that, since he actually lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes) is the last stand of a dying social order. Maybe it's understandable that people would be freaked out by this. After all, change is never easy, especially such a seismic shift. But no matter which way you slice it, there's no excuse for supporting such a hateful, ignorant man as Donald Trump, or for willfully spreading and maintaining that ignorance.
In the first place, let's be clear. There's no such thing as "fake news," at least not in the sense that Trump is using it, Just because you don't like a story doesn't make it fake. Just because you don't agree with something you read doesn't make it fake, Facts are facts, And denying their existence just because you don't like them doesn't make them any less true. Now, granted. It must be hard to be a Trump supporter. Just the sheer number of scandals and missteps that need defending must be exhausting. It's almost enough to make you feel sorry for them, until you begin to take a closer look at Trump's (and the GOP's) agenda.
Take the GOP's doomed effort to repeal and replace Obamacare. This may be the single meanest piece of legislation I"ve ever seen. Among other things, it would undo the gains of the last eight years in the number of people with access to health care. More than 20 million people would be knocked off the rolls, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. It would once again allow insurance companies to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. And perhaps, worst of all, it would allow insurance providers to charge older Americans (read, those who can least afford it) up to five times more than younger Americans. This shouldn't be called "repeal and replace." It should be
called what it is: "Repeal and restore" (as in restore the old, broken system we had before). Or better yet, "the Ebenezer Scrooge Act of 2017" (You know, as in, 'If there be poor people, then let them be about the business of dying and reduce the excess population.'"
Or take the administration's controversial Muslim ban. Trump and his supporters are playing this off as a way to ensure national security. That's disingenuous, at best. Consider that one of the biggest sponsors of international terrorism -- Saudi Arabia -- isn't on the list. Or that Trump himself has called this a Muslim ban. Let's call this what this is: This is racist fear-mongering at its worst. And the worst part is, it does nothing to make us any safer. For those who defend it, it calls into question whether you are, in fact, racist, or whether you are just willfully ignorant.
I think CNN commentator Van Jones hit the nail on the head Electikon Night when he observed that Trump's victory was a case of "whitelash," that it's a reaction against eight years of Obama -- the nation's first black president. This nation is changing, It's becoming more diverse. And there's a segment of the population that feels threatened by that. Trump's victory (if you can call it that, since he actually lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes) is the last stand of a dying social order. Maybe it's understandable that people would be freaked out by this. After all, change is never easy, especially such a seismic shift. But no matter which way you slice it, there's no excuse for supporting such a hateful, ignorant man as Donald Trump, or for willfully spreading and maintaining that ignorance.
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
Trump trying to sabotage his own presidency
With Donald Trump in the White House, the ghosts of Watergate have come back to haunt a whole new generation. First, we saw Trump fire his FBI director. He didn't fire him because of some grave moral failing or because he broke the law. He didn't fire him because he was incompetent. No, he fired him because of his continuing investigation into Trump's treasonous ties with Russia. This was, of course, at first flatly denied by Vice President Mike Pence, but it was later confirmed by Trump himself. And it harkens back to "The Saturday Night Massacre" during the Watergate scandal, when Nixon fired the special prosecutor looking into the whole Watergate mess.
That's just coincidence, you say? Well, consider this. Trump recently admitted in an interview that he might have taped conversations in the Oval Office. Again, Nixon did the same thing. In fact, those Nixon tapes became the crux of a legal battle which ultimately drove the final nail into the Nixon presidency's coffin. And now Trump is admitting doing the same thing? I'm sorry, but that's more than just coincidence.
If I didn't know better, I"d almost say that Trump is doing everything he can to sabotage his own presidency. It's almost like he ran for president on a whim, or to satisfy his own, massive ego. He never planned on winning. Only people liked what he had to say. They ate it up, and suddenly, he found himself leading in the polls. Trump was too proud to bow out, so he kept going. And to everyone's shock, he actually won. Now, he actually has to do something. He actually has to govern, and he's in over his head.
Now, any smart person would have admitted their error and resigned, turning government over to people who actually know something about government. But not Trump. Trump is too arrogant to ever admit that he doesn't know everything. So, unable to get out of his own web, he has set about trying to sabotage his own presidency, hoping that Congressional Republicans will do him the favor of putting him out of his misery
Only they won't. Because Congressional Republicans are just as trapped as Trump himself. To impeach him, as he already so richly deserves, would be to admit that they made a mistake, that they threw their support behind the wrong guy. That shows a serious lack of judgment on the part of the GOP. And so, they will continue to slavishly support him, even as their party founders around them.
The GOP survived Watergate in the 70s, and even came out stronger. But as many parallels as there are between our current mess and Watergate, there are also some key differences. Watergate was a simple matter of a president lying to cover up his own knowledge of a criminal act. That's bad enough. In Trump, we have a leader who is openly and gleefully incompetent. We have a leader who has no knowledge of this nation's Constitution and an open admiration for dictators. And we have a leader who has flirted with abandoning our nation's democratic principles in favor of a more authoritarian approach to governance. Trump is a cancer on the GOP. He is slowly strangling the life out of the party, and I predict that if we survive the next four years -- and that's a big if -- it will be a long time -- if ever -- before this country elects another Republican president
That's just coincidence, you say? Well, consider this. Trump recently admitted in an interview that he might have taped conversations in the Oval Office. Again, Nixon did the same thing. In fact, those Nixon tapes became the crux of a legal battle which ultimately drove the final nail into the Nixon presidency's coffin. And now Trump is admitting doing the same thing? I'm sorry, but that's more than just coincidence.
If I didn't know better, I"d almost say that Trump is doing everything he can to sabotage his own presidency. It's almost like he ran for president on a whim, or to satisfy his own, massive ego. He never planned on winning. Only people liked what he had to say. They ate it up, and suddenly, he found himself leading in the polls. Trump was too proud to bow out, so he kept going. And to everyone's shock, he actually won. Now, he actually has to do something. He actually has to govern, and he's in over his head.
Now, any smart person would have admitted their error and resigned, turning government over to people who actually know something about government. But not Trump. Trump is too arrogant to ever admit that he doesn't know everything. So, unable to get out of his own web, he has set about trying to sabotage his own presidency, hoping that Congressional Republicans will do him the favor of putting him out of his misery
Only they won't. Because Congressional Republicans are just as trapped as Trump himself. To impeach him, as he already so richly deserves, would be to admit that they made a mistake, that they threw their support behind the wrong guy. That shows a serious lack of judgment on the part of the GOP. And so, they will continue to slavishly support him, even as their party founders around them.
The GOP survived Watergate in the 70s, and even came out stronger. But as many parallels as there are between our current mess and Watergate, there are also some key differences. Watergate was a simple matter of a president lying to cover up his own knowledge of a criminal act. That's bad enough. In Trump, we have a leader who is openly and gleefully incompetent. We have a leader who has no knowledge of this nation's Constitution and an open admiration for dictators. And we have a leader who has flirted with abandoning our nation's democratic principles in favor of a more authoritarian approach to governance. Trump is a cancer on the GOP. He is slowly strangling the life out of the party, and I predict that if we survive the next four years -- and that's a big if -- it will be a long time -- if ever -- before this country elects another Republican president
Sunday, April 9, 2017
GOP will come to regret 'going nuclear'
Talk about your boneheaded political decisions. Last week, Republicans in the Senate pulled the trigger on the "nuclear option," changing Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster. And why did they exercise such an extreme option? To make it possible to confirm Donald Trump's first pick for the Supreme Court, Neal Gorsuch, with a simple majority vote, despite staunch Democratic opposition. The Republicans won this round. They got their guy. But one wonders if Senate leadership really sat down and thought this all the way through. Their victory is a hollow one, at best. Yes, they got their guy. But I believe they will come to regret "going nuclear" in the long term.
The problem with "going nuclear" is that it has far-reaching and permanent implications. Right now, the GOP is assuming -- rather arrogantly, I think -- that they will ALWAYS have control of the Senate and the House of Representatives. History has shown this not to be the case. At some point, probably in the not-too-distant future the way things are going, Democrats will regain control of Congress and the White House. And what happens when they do? What happens the next time there's an opening on the Supreme Court and the Democrats nominate someone the GOP finds objectionable? By "going nuclear," the GOP will have eliminated its own ability to stop the nomination, or even to really mount a challenge. Talk about "cutting off your nose to spite your face." By ?going nuclear," r Republicans have, in effect, neutered the system of checks and balances that is designed to weed out unqualified or undeserving nominees. This isn't the way the system is supposed to work.
And for whom did they take such a radical step? They did all this for Neal Gorsuch, a judge who is certainly qualified, but who is also undeserving of this lifetime appointment. We're talking about a judge who has routinely ruled against workers' interests in favor of big corporations. In his most famous case, he ruled against a trucker who was fired after choosing to save his own life instead of freezing to death. That not only shows a serious lack of good judgment, but a lack of basic human decency and compassion. Is this really someone we want sitting on the nation's highest court, possibly for decades?
The decision to exercise the "nuclear option," in addition to being incredibly short-sighted, also exposes one of the key symptoms of what is wrong with our political systtem today -- the inability, or unwillingness, to compromise. Members of the Senate might have worked this out if they were willing to move off dead center and actually meet in the middle somewhere. They might have worked this out if they had take n their responsibility seriously and actually considered Gorsuch based strictly on his qualifications. But, no. Republicans were so anxious to "stick it" to Democrats and get their way that they "went nuclear" without considering the long-term implications of that action. There's no denying they won this round. But there's no doubt that they will ultimately come to regret taking such an ill-advised action.
The problem with "going nuclear" is that it has far-reaching and permanent implications. Right now, the GOP is assuming -- rather arrogantly, I think -- that they will ALWAYS have control of the Senate and the House of Representatives. History has shown this not to be the case. At some point, probably in the not-too-distant future the way things are going, Democrats will regain control of Congress and the White House. And what happens when they do? What happens the next time there's an opening on the Supreme Court and the Democrats nominate someone the GOP finds objectionable? By "going nuclear," the GOP will have eliminated its own ability to stop the nomination, or even to really mount a challenge. Talk about "cutting off your nose to spite your face." By ?going nuclear," r Republicans have, in effect, neutered the system of checks and balances that is designed to weed out unqualified or undeserving nominees. This isn't the way the system is supposed to work.
And for whom did they take such a radical step? They did all this for Neal Gorsuch, a judge who is certainly qualified, but who is also undeserving of this lifetime appointment. We're talking about a judge who has routinely ruled against workers' interests in favor of big corporations. In his most famous case, he ruled against a trucker who was fired after choosing to save his own life instead of freezing to death. That not only shows a serious lack of good judgment, but a lack of basic human decency and compassion. Is this really someone we want sitting on the nation's highest court, possibly for decades?
The decision to exercise the "nuclear option," in addition to being incredibly short-sighted, also exposes one of the key symptoms of what is wrong with our political systtem today -- the inability, or unwillingness, to compromise. Members of the Senate might have worked this out if they were willing to move off dead center and actually meet in the middle somewhere. They might have worked this out if they had take n their responsibility seriously and actually considered Gorsuch based strictly on his qualifications. But, no. Republicans were so anxious to "stick it" to Democrats and get their way that they "went nuclear" without considering the long-term implications of that action. There's no denying they won this round. But there's no doubt that they will ultimately come to regret taking such an ill-advised action.
Tuesday, March 14, 2017
Trump wants American dictatorship
It's been some time since I've updated this blog, and a lot has happened in the three-ring circus that is the Trump administration. Two things stick out to me, and I think bear comment.
Several weeks ago, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer held a press "gaggle" instead of a formal press conference. This isn't, by itself, unusual. This is a fairly routine occurrence. What made this one unique, though, was the manner in which it was conducted. Instead of opening the event to the media at large, Trump's people handpicked the media outlets that were allowed to attend, with the idea that those lucky few would share the information with the rest of the unwashed masses in the mainstream media. Predictably, the lucky few that were allowed to attend were primarily made up of conservative news outlets and those who had been friendly to Trump and his ideas. This was wrong. In fact, it was downright unAmerican and should concern us all if we truly value our freedom.
What Trump is trying to do, in his ham-handed, not-so-subtle way, is control the flow of information that gets out to the American people. I guess he figures if he can't control the torrent of negative information that's pouring out about his administration and its incompetence, he'll simply limit those who can have access to that information to those people and media outlets that agree with him.
This whole thing smacks of Hitler and the Third Reich. What Trump is doing is engaging in straight up propaganda. It's no wonder that he's such an unabashed admirer of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. Trump is doing his best to set up his own American dictatorship. Don't believe me? Well, consider the latest in what is already an impressive line of scandals in just his first six weeks.
Last week, Trump accused his predecessor, Barack Obama, of having his offices in Trump Tower wiretapped. Predictably, like most of Trump's claims, he offered absolutely no proof to back up. To his credit, though, he has played it to the hilt, even calling for an investigation into the matter.
It's not unusual that Trump would buy into some far-fetched, paranoid conspiracy theory. Remember, he spent years fanning the flames of the crackpot "birther" movement against Obama. Since taking the White House, he has claimed widespread voter fraud when it became apparent that he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. He has also claimed that he achieved the largest Electoral College victory since Reagan, despite clear evidence to the contrary, and that he drew the biggest Inauguration Day crowd ever. Again, this is is easily debunked. Clearly, Trump lives in his own world, complete with his own facts that bear no resemblance to the reality occupied by the rest of us.
This would almost be funny if it weren't so serious. You see, Trump's wild, unsubstantiated allegations might indicate that he's severely mentally unbalanced, in which case he has no business being president or having access to the nuclear codes. Or maybe he has a more sinister motive. Perhaps he's crazy like a fox and has been playing us this entire time. Perhaps his wild allegations are designed to distract us so we don't notice what's really going on. Or perhaps he's conditioning us by blurring the lines between truth and lies. If he can convince us that we're being lied to by the mainstream media, while at the same time lying openly and brazenly, we'd no longer be able to tell what was truth and what wasn't. This would allow Trump to do whatever he wanted and to do it openly, then to disavow knowledge of the whole thing. And by the time we caught on, it would be too late,.
Maybe, like Trump, I'm being paranoid. I certainly hope so. One thing I can say with certainty, though, is that Trump is just as dangerous as I originally feared. I believe he's is attempting to pave the way for an American dictatorship. The evidence of that fact is right in front of us, if only we have eyes to see it.
Several weeks ago, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer held a press "gaggle" instead of a formal press conference. This isn't, by itself, unusual. This is a fairly routine occurrence. What made this one unique, though, was the manner in which it was conducted. Instead of opening the event to the media at large, Trump's people handpicked the media outlets that were allowed to attend, with the idea that those lucky few would share the information with the rest of the unwashed masses in the mainstream media. Predictably, the lucky few that were allowed to attend were primarily made up of conservative news outlets and those who had been friendly to Trump and his ideas. This was wrong. In fact, it was downright unAmerican and should concern us all if we truly value our freedom.
What Trump is trying to do, in his ham-handed, not-so-subtle way, is control the flow of information that gets out to the American people. I guess he figures if he can't control the torrent of negative information that's pouring out about his administration and its incompetence, he'll simply limit those who can have access to that information to those people and media outlets that agree with him.
This whole thing smacks of Hitler and the Third Reich. What Trump is doing is engaging in straight up propaganda. It's no wonder that he's such an unabashed admirer of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. Trump is doing his best to set up his own American dictatorship. Don't believe me? Well, consider the latest in what is already an impressive line of scandals in just his first six weeks.
Last week, Trump accused his predecessor, Barack Obama, of having his offices in Trump Tower wiretapped. Predictably, like most of Trump's claims, he offered absolutely no proof to back up. To his credit, though, he has played it to the hilt, even calling for an investigation into the matter.
It's not unusual that Trump would buy into some far-fetched, paranoid conspiracy theory. Remember, he spent years fanning the flames of the crackpot "birther" movement against Obama. Since taking the White House, he has claimed widespread voter fraud when it became apparent that he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. He has also claimed that he achieved the largest Electoral College victory since Reagan, despite clear evidence to the contrary, and that he drew the biggest Inauguration Day crowd ever. Again, this is is easily debunked. Clearly, Trump lives in his own world, complete with his own facts that bear no resemblance to the reality occupied by the rest of us.
This would almost be funny if it weren't so serious. You see, Trump's wild, unsubstantiated allegations might indicate that he's severely mentally unbalanced, in which case he has no business being president or having access to the nuclear codes. Or maybe he has a more sinister motive. Perhaps he's crazy like a fox and has been playing us this entire time. Perhaps his wild allegations are designed to distract us so we don't notice what's really going on. Or perhaps he's conditioning us by blurring the lines between truth and lies. If he can convince us that we're being lied to by the mainstream media, while at the same time lying openly and brazenly, we'd no longer be able to tell what was truth and what wasn't. This would allow Trump to do whatever he wanted and to do it openly, then to disavow knowledge of the whole thing. And by the time we caught on, it would be too late,.
Maybe, like Trump, I'm being paranoid. I certainly hope so. One thing I can say with certainty, though, is that Trump is just as dangerous as I originally feared. I believe he's is attempting to pave the way for an American dictatorship. The evidence of that fact is right in front of us, if only we have eyes to see it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)